Publications

Over the last two decades, concerns have arisen in the veterinary profession about the declining number of food animal veterinarians. Based on a One Health perspective which recognizes that the health of people, animals, and their environment are interconnected, the French policymakers implemented a set of policies to combat the veterinarian shortage in the food animal sector that may cause public health crises. However, public interventions are unlikely to succeed in combating the veterinarian shortage unless they are preceded by a relevant understanding of the main determinants underlying this shortage. This paper contributes to identifying the main factors of the veterinarian shortage in 2019 in the French cattle sector using databases that integrate French veterinary clinics, farm characteristics and socio-economics features, and a spatial econometrics framework. Our results highlighted, first, strong and positive spatial autocorrelation in terms of veterinarian shortage between observations. Second, favorable socio-economic characteristics of a region were associated with a reduction in veterinarian shortage. Third, proximity to urban regions was associated with a decreased veterinarian shortage. Based on these findings, we provided some recommendations to policymakers.

Concern has been raised about the potential greenwashing/co-optation of regenerative agriculture (RA) due to a lack of consensus on its definition. While the academic literature has cataloged various approaches to defining RA, each definitional approach carries with it a relative concern for its likelihood for co-optation and the potential transformative power it can have within the sector. As the industrial agrifoods sector is taking interest in the field, lessons from the organic movement are worth highlighting. The corporate system has easily integrated the foundational pillar of growing food without chemicals, but left behind the pillars of alternative food distribution, and a focus on whole foods and unprocessed ingredients. Corporate interest in RA could be a major driver for scaled adaptation, yet it may lose its focus on the regeneration of agriculture resources, ecosystems functions, and the social systems required to reproduce the next generation of farmers. The greatest challenge is that the fundamental concern is a philosophical one, which entails a shift in how humans perceive the natural world and their role in it. As RA scales, will it hold to its values and remain obscure, or could its values merge with the predominant industrial system to have significance and affect real change in agriculture?

This scoping review aims to systematically assess and synthesize current digital technologies and methodologies used in Canadian crop production research, including remote sensing, artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), robotics, and automation. The review examines how these technologies address key agricultural challenges, such as crop monitoring, pest management, irrigation, and soil health, while also exploring the perspectives of Canadian farmers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers on the opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations associated with digital technology adoption in agriculture. The analysis centers on Canada’s unique agricultural landscape, which combines ambitious sustainability goals with a sociopolitical framework that influences the innovation and integration of Digital Agricultural Technologies (DATs). As a significant food exporter, Canada faces region-specific barriers to DAT adoption, shaped by regulatory considerations, data governance, and privacy concerns. The review highlights that, while Canadian public sector-led research and innovation funding supports DAT development and testing, the widespread application of these technologies remains limited, with many still in experimental stages. By focusing on the technical and socio-technical dimensions, this review contextualizes DAT adoption as influenced by institutional, regulatory, and social factors unique to Canada, including emission reduction targets and data sovereignty. Using a sectoral innovation system framework, this study integrates technical data with social science perspectives to identify barriers and drivers impacting DAT diffusion in Canada, proposing a Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) approach to address challenges. This nuanced analysis offers insights for policymakers and stakeholders, underscoring the need for continued research and cross-regional validation to support sustainable DAT integration. Notably, while findings are specific to Canada’s crop production sector, they lay the groundwork for future policy directions and highlight gaps in international comparison that could inform Canada’s approach to DAT development.

Background: The world’s governments have agreed both global and national actions to address the challenge of antimicrobial resistance. This raises the importance of understanding to what degree national action so far has been effective. Answering this question is challenged by variation in data availability and quality as well as disruptive events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigate the association between a survey of self-reported action based on the first Global Database for Tracking Antimicrobial Resistance (TrACSS) survey and trends in multiple indicators related to the DPSEEA framework leading up to the survey. Methods and findings: We apply regression methods across 73 countries between actions in 2016 and the trend in indicators of health system development (drivers), antibiotic use (pressures, ABU), absolute rates of resistance (state, ABR) and relative rates of resistance (exposure, Drug Resistance Index, DRI) from 2000 to 2016. We find that action is consistently associated with improved linear and categorical trend in health systems, ABU, ABR and DRI. Reductions are associated with relatively high levels of action (0-4) for ABU (median 2.8, 25-75% quartile 2.6-3.3), ABR (3.0, 2.4-3.4), and DRI (3.5, 3.1-3.6). These associations are robust to the inclusion of other contextual factors such as health system and socio-economic status, human population density, animal production and climate. Since 2016, a majority of both Low-Middle Income Countries (LMICs) and High-Income Countries (HICs) report increased action on repeated questions, while one third of countries report reduced action. The main limitations in interpretation are heterogeneity in data availability and the recency of action. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of national action to address the domestic situation related to antibiotic resistance and indicate the value of both incremental changes in reducing adverse outcomes and the need for high levels of action in delivering improvements.